The value is nothing to say. Guests shared more dry goods and valued friends were resolved.
Now all major mobile phone brands are focusing on photography, and dual cameras have become standard on the flagship. However, even if the mobile phone's shooting ability is getting higher and higher today, everyone will choose to start with a real camera to record the beauty of life. Moment. However, there are many types of cameras, and the corresponding lens is also varied. When preparing for pit photography, how do you choose from a wide range of camera brands and lens types? In this issue we have invited @yst_terry to talk to you about camera purchase and lens purchase. If you are thinking about starting a camera, or if you are already a photography enthusiast, please feel free to ask @yst_terry
This issue of the topic: pit photography, camera lens should be how to choose?How can I choose my own first camera? What issues should be considered?
Then a variety of shots can be selected. How can I make reasonable moves?
What equipment needs to be prepared to handle the camera and lens?
......
The above is an example problem. This article has a lot of dry goods. You can ask questions to your guests according to your actual needs. (You can use the mobile phone's friends to ask questions directly in the comment area @yst_terry. The PC's value friends can click “I want to ask questions†to ask questions directly. District slightly.)
I want to consult
Current guests: @yst_terry
In fact, photography-related content is catching a lot of attention on the Internet, and Zhang Aunt’s “photo gallery†section basically covers all the photography knowledge you may need, but for many newcomers preparing to enter the pit , To see more, the purchase is still confused, and I was just ready to buy a camera. Then this article will provide you with a selection of equipment from the perspective of demand.
The so-called demand is what you want to shoot in the beginning, what is the situation that made you think of buying a camera. For example, seeing a friend's travel photos are very beautiful and they also want to shoot; for example, you can't be satisfied with the quality of the mobile phone; for example, you want to capture the beauty of the female ticket. Before buying your first camera, you can ask yourself why you want to buy it? What did you want to shoot? And how much budget can there be? The following figure is for reference only.
(In order to facilitate reading, all of the following use "micro-single" instead of "non-anti-")
----------Dividing line----------
First, how to choose your own first camera - SLR or micro single or non-changeable lens cameraWe usually refer to SLRs and micro-singles as “interchangeable lens camerasâ€. The usefulness of changing lenses is that they allow us to take photos of different styles because there is no 10-1000mm F0.95 cookie head in the world if a lens is used. Unable to meet all our shooting needs, we must unscrew it for another one. This is a big reason for choosing SLRs and micro-singles.
Another reason is that the SLR micro-single CMOS sensor is larger, the image quality is better and the blur is better, and the interchangeable lens camera is light and compact, so the sensor size is also small (except for the RX1R series), and the size of the CMOS is very large. The degree determines the quality and degree of blur.
So you can first think about whether you have the desire to buy multiple shots, whether you are willing to carry the camera back, whether you are willing to spend a lot of money on photography, whether you need to blur, whether you care about "my camera is not a SLR."... ... If you do not care, then "can not change the lens camera" is a good choice, the main push the big end of the card, the quality finishes the explosion of the mobile phone, portable finish SLR micro-single. The following three are all one inch CMOS and the same pixels, but I recommend the Sony RX100, if the screen is not clear under the big sun, it has a viewfinder can play.
If you do not care about the volume, do not want to toss the lens, but there is a telephoto demand to shoot the bird, then buy RX10 series is also very good â–¼
However, I guess that most people who come in should not consider the above, then the question becomes whether to choose a SLR or a micro-single. The two of the shooting principle I can not go into details, in fact, the performance is not much difference, the main difference is:
SLR looks professional, strong sailing, cheap lenses are optional, not portable, focusing as micro-single (same price with the same grade);
Micro-single looks unprofessional, life is weak, the lens is more expensive, more portable, better focus.
I personally recommend that novices start playing from micro-single, simple to use, low cost of learning, WYSIWYG, slowly learning parameters and other knowledge in the process of playing, are interested to make people play, complex menus and lists may be Combat the enthusiasm of novices for learning. Of course, this is just my personal advice. The SLR also has its own advantages. It depends on what you like.
Setting a budget is very important. Think about how much you are willing to spend on this project if you are not sure how long it will last for photography. This budget refers to the first phase of the investment after entering the pit, that is, the stage of accumulation of interest. If it is found that there is no interest in buying, it is quite possible to throw corners to eat gray. What is the maximum amount that one can bear?
If the budget is <1W, I think the input ratio of the lens body should be ≤ 1:1, the best body should not choose the cheapest entry model, psychologically cheap low-end machine is difficult to make you orgasm, and expensive machines to play It is especially cool.
Eg Canon 77D + 18-200 + 50F1.8
Nikon D7100 + 18-140 + 35F1.8
Sony A6000 + 16-50 + 30F1.4Art
Sony A7 + 50F1.8 + 28F2
If 1W ≤ budget ≤ 2W, you can enter the full width, lens body 2:1 is better,
Eg Canon 6D + 35F1.4ART + 50F1.4
Nikon D610 + 24-120 + 14-24
Sony A6300 + 16-70 + 30F1.4Art + 50F1.8
Sony A7M2 + 28-70 + 55F1.8ZA + 16-35
If the budget is 3W, there are many ways to play, love to toss the lens to buy the full range of entry, such as Nikon D610 + 24-120 + 20F1.8 + 35F1.8 + 50F1.8 + 85F1.8; do not toss to buy advanced full-width For example D810 or A7R2, if the budget is not a problem then there is no other problem
—— Full Frame or APS-C or M4/3Commonly referred to as the "frame" is the size of the CMOS sensor, in general, the larger the CMOS sensor, the larger the signal-to-noise ratio and the greater the dynamic range. In short, it is "good picture quality and easy retouching." And in the case of obtaining the same composition, the full focal length needed for the full frame makes the blur even better. At the same focal length, the small format machines can play farther. Therefore, it is more appropriate to use the APS-C and M4/3 for sporting subjects and flowers and birds. Everyone calls it "making long shots."
To a certain extent, your budget has already decided the size of the picture, but when the entry full size and half the flagship price are similar, you still need to choose according to your own needs. Like the full-width D750 and the half-width D7500, the price is similar. If you need portraits and high sense, you should choose D750. If you want to shoot baby or sports, you need to select the D7500 with faster focus.
Full-frame: Indoor/dark environment with less noise, good picture quality, good blur, and expensive lens;
APS-C: lightweight, earning telephoto, more than full-field focus, cheaper lenses;
M4/3: Lightweight MAX, most self-timer, faster focus, and cheaper lens.
It is not unreasonable to say that “Canon Portraits, Nikon Scenery†has spread around the market. Since the dynamic range of Canon is far behind Nikon’s Sony, the adjustability of the later stage may be worse than that of Nikon’s Sony (Dynamic Range is the darkest-lightest range of the picture. The more details, the bigger. But if you shoot a portrait, Canon's colors look better. Although the colors can also be adjusted lately, I think the portrait is much more difficult later than other subjects, and the skin tone is about the same.
Unlike the two SLR markets, the micro-single market has relatively more brands. In addition to Sony, Fuji, Panasonic, Olympus and Canon M have at least a certain amount of competition, and each Different positioning. However, no matter which one I choose, I recommend buying a modern model. The best time to release is not earlier than 2013-14. Otherwise, the focus experience will be poor.
Canon
The so-called toothpaste factory, the new model kept coming out, the hardware upgrade was very small, and the technical decentralization was like toothpaste. In spite of this, Tucao is the only professional Canon SLR in most people's minds. Before that, there was the saying "Canon's telephoto, Nikon's wide-angle", but I think this gap is also metaphysics. It is difficult to see the top lenses with the naked eye, so the choice of the door is mainly based on personal preferences and the richness of the lens group. Nikon should be more abundant in this regard. but-
Choosing Canon, you have the world's most cost-effective fixed-focus “little beak†(50F1.8), there are B-full dot white rabbits (70-200F2.8 IS II), and F1.2 Frame Lens (50/85F1.2).
Novice to buy SLR, Canon is a good choice, straight out Nikon good-looking, the brand is more valuable than Nikon, and full-pixel dual-core focus speed is very fast, this will only be applied on the new camera, so I would recommend the following several. If the price difference between the 760D and the new 77D let me choose, I think it is better to buy the latter. In addition there is a high value and small 200D white, sister used pretty good. To be cheaper, there is only one 1300D left. We don't recommend buying it. If there is only a 3k budget, I think it is better to buy a micro A5100.
As for the Canon M micro-single, it is not recommended. The quality of the machine is not bad. However, the main problem is that the lens is barely available. It is too clunky to transfer your own SLR camera, and the price of M5/M6 is not competitive with Sony. People have no desire, Canon M for Canon SLR micro-single and double repair, buy an adapter ring SLR lens.
For full-frame, 6D2 or 6D is recommended. The former is the latest machine. Although it is pit but no other option is available, the 5D4 is too expensive. The 5D3 is too old. The price is not reduced until the production is stopped. The latter 6D is the 2012 machine, and is as old as the 5D3. , The full range of poor people.
If you do not like micro-singles and do not like scenes, you can choose Canon.
If you do not like micro-singles, but like large scenes, but also like to shoot portraits, then select Canon.
If you do not know that you like to shoot, do not like micro-single, think SLR is more professional, then choose Canon.
Nikon
But if you like scenery, then it's better for Nikon. Then you have a 14-24F2.8 (star weapon), also has "the essence of human optics history" - 501.8D (human fine), but also has a very cost-effective 1.8 Corps, and a lot of cheap and easy to use Old shot.
Nikon lenses are mainly divided into three categories: E/G/D. E is the latest and most expensive electromagnetic aperture lens. Basically, we don't think about it. G head is now the most common Nikon lens (representing no iris ring and AF ); D head is the old lens left by the film era, with D7XXX and more advanced body can auto focus. In short, like toss should buy Nikon, Amoy second-hand goods is also very fun.
But Nikon users are often joking, sad stories
In fact, many of Nikon’s technologies are leading Canon’s, and the main problem is color. “Nikon yellow†shoots people without Canon. Recommended, I think D7200 is better, no low-pass filter picture quality is very good, and then the D5300 and D7100 can also choose cheaper. Even though the D5600 is a new model, it looks like the D5300 hasn't improved much. It's better to buy the D7100. The D500 and D7500 are the main focus machines and are too expensive to recommend.
Full-frame body, then there are optional D610 and D750, D750 is a God machine, good performance and flip screen, but not expensive, it is highly recommended. D610 is also a poor choice, according to the budget and power. As for the D810 I think the price is too expensive for the novice, there is the D750 price is too high, so I really do not desire D810 (no money)
Nikon has a wealth of old lenses, D head can auto focus on D7XXX and higher machines, focusing speed is not slow, basically cheap in the second-hand market circulation, playability is higher than the Canon system, love tossing people can consider.
Sony
There was a day after Sony, the Zeiss coating contest fairy, into the Sony micro-single door, you have the cheapest and most lightweight full-width machine, the fastest half-width micro-single, also has only more than 500 grams of 12-24F4 , Also has a sharp 55F1.8, and the only drawback is the belief that the lens is expensive, and almost no deputy factory (almost), because there is no old lens, so the focal length is complete, but there are fewer options for the focal segment.
Sony E-port lenses are lighter and more compact than SLR lenses (though some are only a few tens of grams), and they are all generally higher in optical quality of new lenses. Compared with SLRs and micro-slots with the same price, SLR's center point is faster, but other positions are faster. The single-focus is faster and covers a larger area. I think the overall experience is better. And because of the "what you see is what you get," the microfilm has a higher rate, especially for novices.
Sony's machine I think can be purchased across the board (except a6500), even the cheapest A5000, because of the size and ease of use, is also a good choice. Of course, I still recommend buying the A6000 and A6300, with a continuous shooting speed of 11 shots per second in half (D500 is 10 shots per second), focusing on the same price as any player. The A6300 has been greatly improved on the quality and focusing focus than the A6000. If the A6000 is called "useful," then the A6500 is "super easy to use." The A6500 is not recommended because it is too expensive but it is practically more than a five-axis anti-shake, and the weight increase of 17% to 410g is completely unnecessary for us.
Full frame, the best use of the full-page A7M2, the highest sense of high-pixel machine A7R2, bought no regrets. As for the five-axis image stabilization, this is a deified thing. The lens with about 50mm or less has a certain effect, but it is a lot worse than the lens stabilization. Therefore, this thing has the best, and if it does not, it is not necessary to purchase Sony specifically for it. The first generation of A7 is not mature because of problems such as deformed mounts and high-gloss green caps, unless it is not particularly bad or not to buy a generation.
Sony can almost transfer all other homes' automatic heads and antique manual heads, but the speed of the focus will be slower after the automatic heads are switched, and it will be slow to run in low light. The usability is very low. It is best to play the automatic head switch. Look at the speed of the other people's focus on the video and then decide that slow focusing will be dead.
Fuji
There is a saying that says "Sony is suitable for someone else, and Fuji is suitable for being photographed", which means that Fuji's beautiful literary art can be used as accessories or ornaments. Fuji's product line is divided into micro-single and rangefinder cameras. APS-C format, the lens is rich, there are F1.2 lens but the frame is small so the blur is not as good as Canon F1.2. The Fuji machine is simple to operate, with beautiful colors, and is suitable for photographers who want to shoot. The price of the micro-single series is more expensive than the Sony models of the same grade, and the focusing speed is lower than that of Sony, but after all, the Fuji machine is beautiful. The man can bring in sisters, and the sister can install art.
So if you think at first glance, “Wow! It's so beautiful! The turntable is so much! True Photography!†Then buy it, you won’t regret it!
Micro-single I like the XT20, and the features of appearance, focusing, and video are average. The entry machine has XA10 and XA3, XA10 is cheaper but only 1600W pixels so it is not considered. The most beautiful is the flagship XT2, watching those dials is enough for you to climax, performance in each APS-C model is estimated to be ranked in the top 5, the price is very moving, black version of 1W, carbon crystal ash to change color Add 2000 so I still recommend XT20
There are two rangefinder cameras, all very beautiful and very expensive, XPRO2 can change the lens, X100F can not. The rangefinder camera uses a small window in the upper right corner of the fuselage for pure optical viewing. There will be aberrations, and there may be no micro-single and SLR convenience for overall use, but the operation is very flavorful. Suitable for playing slowly, not suitable for hurried photographs.
If there is no clear demand, there is no “Single-Stage Plot,†and you don’t want to learn later on, you don’t want to toss. You just want to enjoy the fun of taking photos. Fuji is for you.
Panasonic & Olympus
They belong to the M4/3 format camp, and the CMOS sensor is smaller than the APS-C. The disadvantages are poor quality of the high-sensitivity picture, weak virtual effect, and low pixel. But at the same time, the body and the lens are both lighter and lighter, and they are friendly to travel and daily shooting. And the mid-range model has a five-axis body image stabilization.
Both belong to the same camp and have little difference in hardware performance, but their focus is slightly different. Panasonic main video, GF9 should be the cheapest on the market to shoot 4k models, and Panasonic single focus to be faster. The GX85 is positioned at the mid-range, has a viewfinder and 5-axis image stabilization, is a few hundred more expensive than the GF9, and has a larger weight and volume. Need to be extremely portable and choose GF9 better.
Olympus is more focused on some professional features and their own retro design, all systems have body image stabilization. So, if you want to shoot video, please select Panasonic. If you like retro, please choose Olympus. You don't know which one to read.
Pentax
The paint factory that used to evoke rain and rain is now the feelings of the rest. In a word, don’t buy these Malay Dragons deputies to give him shots, which shows the degree of sunset. So many years finally pulled out the full-scale K1 cost-effective invincible, high-pixel, no low-pass, body anti-shake ..... but they can not even give full-frame with a few shots, some of the APS-C lens in the sale Can be used to close the aperture on K1, but this...
Pentax: DA head received F8 just used on K1, this is not your favorite F8! Don't leave! I'll come back with medium format! You group of liar!
So many brands, each have their own characteristics, the industry specializing in surgery, usually have their own better themes. In fact, the above is also mentioned more or less, here is a brief summary, does not include particularly expensive models.
Scenery, Starry Sky: Nikon
Portrait: Canon
Sports: Sony A6300, Panasonic GX85
Continuous shooting/snapshot: Sony A6000, A6300
Video: Sony A6300, Panasonic GF9, GX85, Fuji XT20
Body Image Stabilization: Sony A7M2, Panasonic GX85, Olympus
Night Scene: Full Frame Machine
Art and Culture: Fuji, Olympus
--------Dividing line---------------
Second, the choice of lensEveryone often says that SLR is poor and three generations. The ones that really make you poor are the camera. We say that we have to play photography and play with cameras. In fact, we are playing with more cameras. So if you are ready to buy a camera, I would suggest that you have at least two lenses. After all, if you don’t change lenses, what’s the difference between salted fish and fish? Black card.
—— What is the sharpness of zoom and focus?For beginners, a zoom + focal configuration is the most common. The function of the zoom is to cover the focal length, and the near far can be shot; and the fixed focus has more effects, allowing the novice to experience the fascinating blur brought by the large aperture, which can help increase the shutter speed and provide better picture quality. In addition, it is very important that the fixed focus can help you develop the habit of composition before pressing the shutter.
We often hear people say "this lens is really sharp" to describe the quality of the picture, this "sharp" refers to the sharpness, is the ability to restore the color level of the picture. Many people will confuse the sharpness with the resolution. In fact, these are two concepts. In the common sense, sharpness is the sharpness of the edge of the object, and the resolution is the clarity of the whole picture.
The sharpness and resolution of fixed focus are usually higher than normal zoom, so the two concepts are easy to mix and normal. Explained so much, in fact, I just want to say, of course, you want to play fixed focus pro
The main function of ambiguity is to isolate the subject from the background, so as to highlight the subject and be more needed in outdoor or messy environments. The blurring can increase the aperture or increase the focal length. It can also be achieved by shortening the distance to the subject. Many people scoff at phrasing, thinking that this does not reflect the level of composition, but I do not agree that novices must first play with their own interests. Only by taking sugar can they know that they like it or not. Only the first poisoning can detoxify them. Everyone's own view of photography is formed in the process of constantly wasting the shutter, so enjoy the teenager.
Telephoto can capture something farther away, and has a very strong ability to compress space. It won't capture anything that's messy around, highlighting the subject. The amount of debris is reduced, and the composition becomes easy, so telephoto is very friendly to novices.
The wide angle is relative to it, the picture contains too much content, want to shoot a shocking and great film to test the skill of composition, the aircraft position and angle also have higher requirements, so most people are the first telephoto, after the Wide angle. Landlord as a device and equipment equipment which is not technically acceptable, can only use the wide-angle pat buildings, other I also shot bad.
So before entering the super-wide angle, I suggest starting with 24mm to 35mm to start practicing. With less and less waste films, you can play super-wide angle more easily.
Anti-shake is very important for non-fixed lenses that contain a focal length of 70mm or more. In the handheld case, the photo is shot because the shutter speed is not enough, the shutter speed is not enough because the light is not enough, if you can not change the ambient light, you can only solve by increasing the aperture, because the fixed focus aperture is larger, so most Without anti-shake function. However, the focal length like 70-200 is long and heavy, and the iron hand is no use. It must have lens stabilization. In the focal length below 70mm, the effect of hand-shake on the picture will be smaller, and it does not matter if it is not, such as Nikon's old 24-70.
Canon - cookies, tarts, 24-105, needless to say
Nikon - cheap big aperture ultra wide, end of the world mirror, 1.8 Corps, D head
Sony - 55F1.8, affordable 28F2, Sec
Sigma - Godhead 35Art, Black Technology F1.8 Zoom (half), Star Artifact 20Art
Tenglong - big three yuan series
Fuji - F1.2 virtual weapon, equivalent 35mm 23F2
---------------Dividing line----------------
Third, flash and flash deviceThe APS-C model has an internal top flash, but if you want to take a good photo, this internal flash is really useless. You need an external flash and a flash unit.
—— The role of a flash trigger to unlock more poses for youWith a flash unit, the position of the flash can be placed at will, so the flash is not only a function of supplementing brightness, but has become a tool for lighting effects, but my photography technology is limited, not very good The interpretation of off-machine flash, so we can look at the following two articles, it is worth learning.
Moving two or three thousand original lamps is indeed good, color temperature accurate, TTL accurate, but for our poor, a lamp's money is enough for a shot, so we have to consider the deputy factory. In fact, the deputy factory now does a very good job, especially the Sony Cognac - Shenniu
In the past, there was no deputy factory lamp on the Sony mi hot shoe, but only the Japanese clear but more than a thousand, until the Shenniu TT685 appeared, 2.4G wireless flash, TTL, 1/8000 high-speed synchronization of some functions have , Jingdong photography accessories activities only less than 500. However, if I buy it now, I will buy the V860II and the lithium battery will be faster and more durable.
Like a portable friend can consider the next TT350, I also used, very small, but two batteries continuous shooting back slow, in addition to all very good.
As for the flash device, the X1T function of the Shenniu can also be used, but the exterior design is not very good, no matter how much it is easy to use.
If it is Nikon and Canon, vice factory is more, Yongnuo, Wolong, Steind or something, but I still recommend Shenniu, the main quality is very good, several times in the shed fell from two or three meters high When it comes down, the plastic bumps a bit, and the other zooms and lamp rotations are all OK. In addition to Shennuo Yongnuo, Yongnuo 600EX2 is also good.
Flashlight is this one
---------------Dividing line----------------
Fourth, can not be on the equipment - tripod The tripod is not for everyone. After all, it is not commercial photography. It is not necessary to go out for daily shooting. The tripod is mainly used in occasions where long exposure is required, such as scenery, rails, and indoor still life. These must be tripods. The first two long exposures are for the purpose of letting moving objects such as stars, clouds, and cars pull out a trajectory and shoot out a kind of effect that the human eye can't normally see. Shooting a tripod on a still life is simply because the light in the room is weak.
Like these search tripod keywords out of these absolutely do not buy, poor stability, Yuntai is not easy to use, the outdoor wind blows down. A good shelf allows you to do more with less. If you really want to play well, or if you don’t save the three hundred dollars, you’ll have to eat a meal and buy a serious tripod. You can always use Canon 5D9.
The high-level goods are no longer here. I haven't used them.....I recommend domestically produced, Si Rui, Benro and Futubao.
Sirui and Benro did not differ much. Look for the weight and the length of storage before buying. The more the number of sections, the better the storage and the worse the stability. The first one is the four-leg pipe, which is more stable than the second one. Portability was again affected, so it was still selected on demand. If you mainly shoot in the room, choose a stable, if you want to go out often, choose the best portable can be folded.
Reversible folding stand â–¼
Futubao mainly recommends this mini-rack, climbing the party artifact, and the upper track is used to shoot it. There is a horse path similar to the mini frame but it is not as good as this because the leg length cannot be changed.
—— 2, aluminum alloy, carbon fiber.Aluminum alloy tripod is characterized by resistance to Cao, not easily broken, but heavy. Carbon fiber is about a pound lighter than aluminum alloy, but it is afraid of falling, and the price is much higher. If you want to make carbon fiber, you can use it for a thousand days. The figure should be light and the stability should not be as good as those of Manfrotto's Admiralty Gitzo. I recommend the following about the purchase of the tripod. The explanation is very detailed.
--------------Dividing line--------------
At lastThere are many things that you need to know when you first start to play with the camera. You spend money and spend energy on it. Afterwards, it takes more time and effort to learn to use the camera. Therefore, you still need to have a strong interest to support it.
Photography is ultimately a hobby and recreational activity for most people. Having fun is the most important thing. It's worthwhile to take a heavy equipment to travel and get tired. If you take a particularly happy time, then it's worth it. If you have been complaining that tired regrets should not bring so many things, shooting is meaningless. , may be a light micro-single to increase the zoom but more suitable for you.
This issue of the topic: pit photography, camera lens should be how to choose?Click on the "I want to ask" button to ask a question. The question will appear in this form: # value is nothing to say #@yst_terry XXXXXXX
Please use the value of your mobile phone directly, please remember @yst_terry to let him see
I want to consult
Shenzhen Geyi Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.gy-printer.cn